|
1
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
3
|
- A person who is computationally fluent is able to compute the exact
answer accurately, using paper and pencil, to an arithmetic problem
involving whole numbers with all four operations: addition, subtraction,
multiplication, and division
|
|
4
|
- The problem is that this definition is too narrow in scope. It only takes into account one facet
of computational fluency. In
fact, it ignores the method that is used most often by adults.
|
|
5
|
- • 84.6% of all calculations
involved some form of mental mathematics.
- • 11.1% involved written
mathematics.
- • 6.8% involved the use of
calculators.
- • 19.6% used other physical
objects.
- Total is not 100% because some instances used more than one method.
|
|
6
|
- How much would you spend if you bought one of each?
|
|
7
|
- A computational child
- is automatic with the basic facts
- understands our number system.
|
|
8
|
- A computationally fluent child
- makes a conscious effort to complete calculations using prior knowledge
and simpler calculations.
|
|
9
|
|
|
10
|
- Efficiency
- Accuracy
- Flexibility
|
|
11
|
- A computationally fluent child is Accurate and Efficient.
- The child chooses appropriate calculation methods to obtain exact
answers and to estimate, and
- he/she performs those calculations accurately, and with relative
efficiency.
|
|
12
|
- A computationally fluent child
- can perform the steps in an algorithm correctly and
- can discuss the underlying ideas and important relationships used.
|
|
13
|
- Traditional Algorithm-
- Focused on the digits.
- 140
- - 85
|
|
14
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
20
|
- A computationally fluent child
- is flexible. He/She typically
uses a variety of calculation strategies, even when completing
calculations involving the same operation.
|
|
21
|
- A student might add 3 to both sides making a new sentence 56 - 30 =
|
|
22
|
- Get to a decade number using chunks.
- Add one to 29 to get 30. Add 20 to 30 to get to 50. Add 3 to 50 to get to 53. What’s the
total of the chunks?
- 29 + 1 + 20 + 3 =
53 - 29 = 24
|
|
23
|
- 53 - 23 = 30 and 30 - 2 = 28
- This break apart method involves the understanding of numbers to realize
that 25 = 23 + 2 and that fact is useful in this situation.
- Could also be done 50 - 25
+ 3
|
|
24
|
- The student that uses a flexible approach to computation is much more
powerful than one that only uses the traditional column algorithms.
|
|
25
|
- There is a proven link between smoking and lung cancer and yet despite
that
- Each day, nearly 6,000 children
under 18 years of age start smoking; of these, nearly 2,000 will become
regular smokers. That is almost 800,000 annually. Why?
- Various forms of pressure and
tradition keep the habit alive.
|
|
26
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
31
|
- Classes have different needs so one size does not fit all. Teachers need to have the professional
discretion to decide what their kids need to learn and how to best teach
it.
- However, we also need to agree to have all our kids reach expected
standards no matter how we strive to achieve those goals. And we have to accept that there will
be outside assessments for which we must prepare our kids.
|
|
32
|
- Mini-lessons
- Activities
- Problem Solving
|
|
33
|
- This is a short lesson that is similar to Daily Tune-Ups.
- The difference is mini-lessons are focused on one big idea for a period
of time.
- This long window of learning allows time for fluency to develop.
|
|
34
|
|
|
35
|
- Activities are a form of repetitive practice - like flash cards; but
kids like activities more than paper and pencil drill. They will practice more and longer in
this format.
- Once an activity is introduced, it can be played in small groups with
differentiation that allows time to re-teach those kids that need it.
|
|
36
|
- We need to have a more coherent view of what each grade level is
expected to accomplish in terms of computational fluency (see Frameworks
as guideline).
- Then each grade level must take ownership for making sure all students
are computationally fluent to that standard.
|
|
37
|
- By establishing these standards, my biggest fear is that I will set in
motion a swing back to a system of teaching that is based on a series of
procedures.
- Nothing could be further from my intent.
- I want students who are Numerically Powerful and everything that
implies: accurate, efficient, flexible, with understanding.
|
|
38
|
- We must build from the conceptual to the math notation in a systematic
manner.
- Concrete
- Mathematical Models
- Math Notation
|
|
39
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
41
|
- We need to build the transition from concrete to math notation in a way
that builds on the student’s understanding. If we go too quickly, they just rely
on procedures: a set of rules.
|
|
42
|
- Kids physically interact with the tools.
- Counters
- Snap Cubes
- Money
- Base 10 Blocks
|
|
43
|
- Kids represent the concrete manipulative or a problem situation with a
diagram.
|
|
44
|
- Students learn to label their mathematical models using numerals and
math symbols.
|
|
45
|
- One of my favorite activities is, “What’s Hidden?” It is a part-part-whole activity and
teaches addition and subtraction concepts.
|
|
46
|
- Students take some counters. They
determine how many there are.
Their partner then hides some of them. They must figure out What’s Hidden?
|
|
47
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
51
|
- What algorithm would you use?
- Would you do it in your head, on paper, or with a calculator?
- How do you know your answer is correct?
How sure are you?
|
|
52
|
|
|
53
|
|